You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I could understand, you converted the multi-class classification into independent binary classification, so I assume in Eq. (4) $y_i$ should be the label for one class and therefore, there should be a summation over all classes? I mean it should look like:
where $C$ is the total number of classes in training.
Looking forward to your reply.
Many thanks,
Yiming
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @ZiqinZhou66 ,
Thanks for your great work ZegCLIP. However, I am a bit confused about Equation (4) in your paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.03588.pdf
As far as I could understand, you converted the multi-class classification into independent binary classification, so I assume in Eq. (4)$y_i$ should be the label for one class and therefore, there should be a summation over all classes? I mean it should look like:
where$C$ is the total number of classes in training.
Looking forward to your reply.
Many thanks,
Yiming
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: