-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PSNR #17
Comments
They have slight difference. In the |
That Explains it.Thanks for your enthusiastic reply!I have another question, since the opacity, rgb, scale, and quatrn of the neural Gaussian are predicted by MLP, and the number of parameters of MLP is very small, since this is the case, why don't you also predict the position of the neural Gaussian by MLP, so that there is no need for offsets and scaling as well? |
Thanks for your suggestion! However, we experimentally find MLP is not good at predicting "positions" in our model, and also, "positions" of Gaussians are highly sensitive to deviations since they significantly affect the rendering process. It is a worthwhile research direction, we hope some better approaches could be developed to address this problem. |
Hey, such an excellent work! I have a small doubt about psnr, that is, after the training phase, psnr is calculated in both the render phase and the evaluate phase, theoretically both the values should be the same, but why are they different?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: