Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text format / CSS not used when switching to "New look" in D365 #63

Open
orb-mue-mar opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Comments

@orb-mue-mar
Copy link

Hi Florian,

we can reproduce a problem with the formatting when switching to the "new look" in D365.
It seems that the CSS within the HTML isnt used at all. We already updated it to the latest release.

"New look" turned off:
image

"New look" tuned on: (it also seems that another Editor is in use then, but i am not sure about that)
image

Thank you to have look into it in advance!
Marcus

@DigitalFlow
Copy link
Member

Hi Marcus,

this seems to be about the display of the templated data inside the dynamics rich text editor rather than about the designer itself, right?
I'll take a look at it. Might be though that it's Microsoft that is interfering with the CSS classes in the new UI.

Kind regards,
Florian

@orb-mue-mar
Copy link
Author

Hi Marcus,

this seems to be about the display of the templated data inside the dynamics rich text editor rather than about the designer itself, right? I'll take a look at it. Might be though that it's Microsoft that is interfering with the CSS classes in the new UI.

Kind regards, Florian

Yes, the problem seems to be within the rich text editor when switching to "New look". Thanks for having a look into it.

Regards,
Marcus

@catalinpotinte
Copy link

Hi Florian,

I can confirm we have the same issue in our tenant with the templates when switching to the New look.

Thank you for taking a look.

Best Regards,
Catalin

@orb-mue-mar
Copy link
Author

orb-mue-mar commented Apr 22, 2024

Update: New information: we are also using your Solution in our own environment.
The issue only appears when creating Emails manually.
Automatic generated/sent Emails are not affected.

image

Best regards,
Marcus

@orb-mue-mar
Copy link
Author

orb-mue-mar commented May 22, 2024

Could you find the time to have a look into it?

Kind regards,
Marcus

@catalinpotinte
Copy link

Update:

The above issues still persist with activating the new look.

Lately there is a new "development" and with the new look randomly the body of email fails to load
image

The error message is:

Error Details: Error: Failed to execute 'removeChild' on 'Node': The node to be removed is not a child of this node.
at bu (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:89469)
at Nl (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:101256)
at t.unstable_runWithPriority (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/app.1770bc40965b9d51aafd016172077d13.js:14:3768)
at Wo (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:44549)
at Tl (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:99217)
at pl (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:95328)
at https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:44772
at t.unstable_runWithPriority (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/app.1770bc40965b9d51aafd016172077d13.js:14:3768)
at Wo (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:44549)
at Qo (https://content.powerapps.com/resource/uci-infra-bus/scripts/vendor.1cae5aa28fca3d26e5e989792f80fda6.js:9:44717)

Did anyone else encounter this?

Thank you in advance for your help.

@DigitalFlow
Copy link
Member

I set up an organization where I can try the "new look" and report my findings.
The issue you posted looks very much like the platform was doing something that breaks it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants