Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Explicitly mention new behavior coming in WP 6.6 for block variations #62399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

gziolo
Copy link
Member

@gziolo gziolo commented Jun 7, 2024

What?

Adds mentions about the behavior change coming in WP 6.6 for Block Variations.

Why?

WordPress 6.6 is still not released, so it will be helpful to clarify the differences between WP major versions.

How?

Updates to the documentation.

Code styling changes come from the Prettier integration, which I have always enabled in my IDE.

@gziolo gziolo added [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers [Feature] Block Variations Block variations, including introducing new variations and variations as a feature labels Jun 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Co-authored-by: gziolo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: fabiankaegy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ockham <[email protected]>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@gziolo gziolo mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2024
49 tasks
@gziolo gziolo requested a review from ockham June 7, 2024 06:43
Copy link
Member

@fabiankaegy fabiankaegy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for these updates :)

Copy link
Contributor

@ockham ockham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@ockham ockham added the Backport to WP 6.7 Beta/RC Pull request that needs to be backported to the WordPress major release that's currently in beta label Jun 10, 2024
@ockham
Copy link
Contributor

ockham commented Jun 10, 2024

I added the "Backport to WP Beta/RC" label since I think we'd like these changes in 6.6, as that's what determines what will be at https://developer.wordpress.org/ IIUC.

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Jun 10, 2024

I added the "Backport to WP Beta/RC" label since I think we'd like these changes in 6.6, as that's what determines what will be at https://developer.wordpress.org/ IIUC.

Historically, we have always been using trunk to generate developer docs for the block editor. So, we can verify that in 15-20 minutes. Link:

https://developer.wordpress.org/block-editor/reference-guides/block-api/block-variations/#using-isactive

@gziolo gziolo merged commit e04b36c into trunk Jun 10, 2024
74 of 75 checks passed
@gziolo gziolo deleted the update/docs-block-variations-wp-6.6 branch June 10, 2024 09:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the Gutenberg 18.6 milestone Jun 10, 2024
@gziolo gziolo removed the Backport to WP 6.7 Beta/RC Pull request that needs to be backported to the WordPress major release that's currently in beta label Jun 10, 2024
@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Jun 10, 2024

The changes are already synced in the block editor handbook. Removed the label.

patil-vipul pushed a commit to patil-vipul/gutenberg that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] Block Variations Block variations, including introducing new variations and variations as a feature [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants