Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image block: Add Openverse as a source #55286

Open
cagrimmett opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Image block: Add Openverse as a source #55286

cagrimmett opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
[Block] Image Affects the Image Block [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement.

Comments

@cagrimmett
Copy link

cagrimmett commented Oct 11, 2023

What problem does this address?

Right now the https://wordpress.org/photos directory is underutilized.

What is your proposed solution?

Add it as a source in the image block:

Screenshot 2023-10-11 at 3 37 40 PM

This would build on work done previously to integrate Openverse into the Media tab in the Inserter #44496 and is worth exploring as part of phase 3 work with the media library: #55238

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

Hey there! Looks like you're likely using a plugin or a different hosting provided like WordPress.com as this is the default image option in WordPress currently:

Screenshot 2023-10-11 at 3 24 26 PM

There isn't currently any official source, unless you're adding this way which includes Openverse:

Screenshot 2023-10-11 at 3 25 29 PM

I'm going to close this out as a result!

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

Here's more information about future media library work too in case you're interested: #55238

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

annezazu commented Oct 11, 2023

Opening this after chatting via DM and understanding the use case a bit more (and connecting some dots)! I've taken the liberty to edit and update the issue. For context, we'd want to include Openverse integration as any photo in the photo directory is included in Openverse too and that would match the current experience: https://make.wordpress.org/openverse/handbook/openverse-and-photo-directory/#photo-directory

@annezazu annezazu reopened this Oct 11, 2023
@annezazu annezazu changed the title Add the WordPress Photo Directory as a source in the Image block Image block: Add Openverse as a source Oct 11, 2023
@annezazu annezazu added [Block] Image Affects the Image Block [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement. labels Oct 11, 2023
@Otto42
Copy link
Member

Otto42 commented Oct 12, 2023

Opening this after chatting via DM and understanding the use case a bit more (and connecting some dots)! I've taken the liberty to edit and update the issue. For context, we'd want to include Openverse integration as any photo in the photo directory is included in Openverse too and that would match the current experience:

While that is true, that is not the desired experience.

The ticket was originally about adding the photo directory, and the photo directory is distinctly different from Openverse.

There should be a link and search specifically for the wordpress.org Photos Directory only, without utilizing the Openverse project.

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

While that is true, that is not the desired experience.

Can you say a bit more?

@fcoveram
Copy link
Contributor

Here is an idea that I think gathers both visions.

Since the Photo Directory collection is huge, it needs a way of browsing and searching the images. Therefore, introducing the collection through Openverse features fits both purpose perfectly.

Openverse.in.modal.i1.3.mp4

The idea adds a new option in the image block that opens Openverse in a modal with the Photo Directory collection by default. Important note: The "search free images" action shown as a button in the placeholder, should follow the solution discussed and agreed on #38275.

What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Block] Image Affects the Image Block [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants