-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Block API: Integrate variations with the /
inserter
#20583
Comments
It's a bit unfortunate that the quick inserter is so separate from the main one. Changes to what gets listed there should propagate more easily. |
+1 to this. I just lost 40mins thinking I was doing something wrong because variations were not showing up, only to realize they don't show in the |
Is there already terminology for this kind of inserter? |
Let's see if I got this right. EDIT: The example @nk-o shares seems to me more like styles and should be added to the Styles Panel. Having 5 options for the same block in the inserter is not the level it should be at. |
Probably this issue. |
@paaljoachim variations when exposed in inserter are to be considered new blocks, so they are meant to show up in all inserting contexts. What specific block choose to do is a separate conversation altogether. |
Description
Follow-up for #16283.
With #19243, we integrate block variations API with the inserter. We still should seek a way to do a follow-up for the
/
inserter. At the moment, it only lists block types.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: