Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 13, 2024. It is now read-only.

Sighting Search Export #870

Closed
TanyaStere42 opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #897
Closed

Sighting Search Export #870

TanyaStere42 opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #897
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TanyaStere42
Copy link
Member

TanyaStere42 commented Jul 14, 2023

User stories

As a Researcher+exporter or administrator on the sighting search page, I can export the filtered results of the search page as a xls

  • the export will contain all default and custom sighting and encounter fields

Final design mockup: https://www.figma.com/file/67AYBU2OioLcLpEVdq7uEQ/Codex%3A-support-search-of-all-sighting%2Findividual-content?node-id=0-1&t=JVxfCugm3SBQfd7t-0

@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 added this to the Codex Release 2.1 milestone Jul 14, 2023
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 moved this to Todo in Codex 2.1 Jul 24, 2023
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 25, 2023
@naknomum naknomum linked a pull request Sep 6, 2023 that will close this issue
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 moved this from Todo to In Progress in Codex 2.1 Sep 7, 2023
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 moved this from In Progress to QA Verification in Codex 2.1 Sep 18, 2023
@TanyaStere42
Copy link
Member Author

need to remove customField. prepend on custom fields

@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 reopened this Sep 21, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from QA Verification to In Progress in Codex 2.1 Sep 21, 2023
@TanyaStere42
Copy link
Member Author

re-closing. going to address customField. prepend as part of separate effort

@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 moved this from In Progress to Done in Codex 2.1 Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants