You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @WangYueFt Thanks for your sharing! In the paper, you claimed PRNET is able to handle partial-to-partial registration, but I think in the experiment, you use the rotation sample from [0, 45] and translation in [-0.5, 0.5], which might still result in two point clouds with a quite large overlap. So I wonder have you ever test the model on real world dataset like 3DMatch where the overlap between two point clouds are small?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @WangYueFt Thanks for your sharing! In the paper, you claimed PRNET is able to handle partial-to-partial registration, but I think in the experiment, you use the rotation sample from [0, 45] and translation in [-0.5, 0.5], which might still result in two point clouds with a quite large overlap. So I wonder have you ever test the model on real world dataset like 3DMatch where the overlap between two point clouds are small?
Hi Xuyang,
I didn't test it on the 3DMatch dataset and we're still working on that.
Hi @WangYueFt Thanks for your sharing! In the paper, you claimed PRNET is able to handle partial-to-partial registration, but I think in the experiment, you use the rotation sample from [0, 45] and translation in [-0.5, 0.5], which might still result in two point clouds with a quite large overlap. So I wonder have you ever test the model on real world dataset like 3DMatch where the overlap between two point clouds are small?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: