-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2020 Virtual F2F for Accessibility and Web Components #872
Comments
Thanks for opening an issue for this. I was hoping to learn more about these topics at this F2F! I’d love to attend this call if it works out. (New York, EDT) |
I would love to attend to talk about cross-scope references in general and specially for element reflection. |
Any pointers to use cases / documents about this? |
This sounds like a good idea. And if we make the timing work for Alice it'd probably also work for @jcsteh. Probably not feasible to find a time that spans Australia, Europe, East US, and West US though? |
I'd love to attend if we can make it work. Accommodating four time zones is tricky, but I can be pretty flexible for a one-off. Earliest I can really do while still being remotely useful is about 5AM my time (UTC+10:00), which is 23:00 UTC. Obviously, I'd prefer later, but that's already 9PM in Europe. |
My thinking is that we can probably do it around 9am Sydney, AEDT especially if we wanted someone from Tokyo at 7am JST or Taipei at 6am CST. That would be 10pm London, UTC, 11pm Paris/Zurich, CET, midnight at Helsinki EET. Definitely not Europe friendly time but then this week's meeting was super unfriendly to APAC region so I figured that would be only fair especially given where the relevant people are located for this topic. |
please, add me too! |
Would love to join as well. |
Would it be ok if I attended this as well? |
I would like to attend this as well. The last virtual F2F was a killer since it started at 0:00 JST (15:00 UTC) for me. 4:00 JST (19:00 UTC) or later would be amazing! |
I just added a doodle to vote on the week of this meeting in OP. Please check it out. |
This may be referring to the Opaque Reference idea from whatwg/html#4925 (comment) I would love a discussion on this. |
I'd love my colleagues @chrisosaurus and @dot-miniscule to join as well, if that's ok. They're both in the ~same timezone as me and @jcsteh (starting next week when the east coast of Australia becomes all one timezone again). |
Looks like the week of April 20th is the winner. Alright, we should probably avoid having this on Monday AEDT or Friday PST since we don't want to make people work on Sunday afternoon or Saturday morning. That leaves Monday through Thursday PST and Tuesday through Friday AEDT. Here's a new noodle for specific dates: https://doodle.com/poll/dkssnvttf5kcrm69 |
Please vote on a specific date but it looks like the current winner is: My suggestion is to start it at 2020-04-21T22:00Z and continue for 4 hours. Localized times:
|
Hi all, I'm regrettably informing you all that I'm going on a medical leave of absence until mid May. As a result, I would not be able to attend this meeting if it takes place in April or early May. I'm sorry for causing such a debacle since I'm the one who suggested to have this meeting in the first place but unfortunately I don't have a much choice at the moment. Hope to talk to you all soon again. |
Sorry to hear that @rniwa, I hope everything is ok. Thanks for your attempt to organize this virtual F2F and I look forward to attend the next one! |
@hober Since we couldn't meet in April/May, I was wondering if we could try again to arrange an accessibility-focused meeting between now and TPAC at the end of October. A pre-TPAC meeting would help insure we give accessibility the attention it deserves and leave more time for other topics at TPAC (e.g., finishing up scoped custom element registries). Perhaps we could try for the first half of September? |
I've been in contact with @alice, @hober, and @cookiecrook about this, and it sounds like they'd be up for a pre-TPAC accessibility meeting. Rough timeframe would be a date in first half of September Pinging people cited above for their interest: @bkardell @annevk @tkent-google @muan @justinfagnani @jcsteh @caridy @dbatiste @ekashida — if you're up for this, maybe give a thumbs up on this post If we can get at a quorum that includes at least one person from Mozilla, I'll follow up with a Doodle poll to pick a date. |
Thanks for everyone's interest! Please select your preferred September dates for the accessibility-focused web components meeting using this Doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/7xw2upudh42abqe2. I'll keep the poll open through next week to give people time to respond, then pick a date. Please feel free to forward to people who would likely want to attend. |
Thanks to everyone who responded to the Doodle poll. The best start time appears to be 22:00 UTC on Tuesday, September 15. Localized times: Please save the date! |
I think the Live Agenda for the March 2020 Meeting worked fairly well to orchestrate the remote meeting and summarize the results. With that in mind, I've created a new Live Agenda for the September 2020 meeting.
If anyone has an accessibility + web component topic to add to the agenda, please do so! |
I won't be able to make that time. I suspect John Dai won't be able to attend either then. We can probably chat with @jcsteh afterwards or some such. |
This is really interesting work. Are these open meetings that anyone can attend? |
@annevk Let me know if we should look for another date — I'd picked a date that you'd indicated was one you could make. John had also indicated that the proposed date would work. Perhaps the terrible time for Europe participation had been unclear? That's completely understandable! (I'd just been following the original suggestion to make this meeting more convenient for Pacific folks.) In any event, there are other dates that worked nearly as well, so if the issue was the specific date, let me know. |
Yeah, I did not realize we would keep the same time. I'm fine with reading the notes and chatting with some folks about it afterwards. @F1LT3R in principle, yes. |
Will the meeting details be posted here or is it by invite? I would love to attend. |
Since Google Meet seemed to generally work well last time, I've created a Google Meet link we can use for the call: https://meet.google.com/nnd-eqbe-fyr. |
I'm looking forward to see everyone there! The F2F is starting in less than 2 hours! |
I won't be able to make it but @nicholasrice from my team will be present. I look forward to reading the meeting notes afterwards. Thanks everyone for keeping web components moving ahead! |
Thanks for the productive discussion everyone! |
This is done, thanks everyone! |
When: 22:00 – 26:00 UTC on Tuesday, September 15
Localized times:
San Francisco (PDT): 3pm – 7pm on Tuesday, September 15
Sydney (AEST): 8am – 12pm on Wednesday, September 16
Tokyo (JST): 7am – 11am on Wednesday, September 16
Helsinki (EEST): 1am – 5am on Wednesday, September 16
Paris (CEST): midnight – 4am on Wednesday, September 16
London (BST): 11pm Tuesday, September 15 – 3am Wednesday, September 16
Where: Google Meet
https://meet.google.com/nnd-eqbe-fyr
What: agenda and minutes
Live Agenda for the September 2020 meeting.
Queue
https://tcq.app/meeting/vpn9
Old summary
We had a pretty productive virtual F2F this week for web components.
Should we schedule another virtual conference focused on accessibility topics sometime next month?
We have a few topics for accessibly in web components:
New Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QTcATefkEzUIsmE3xLXb5oDuom4BNCknXiYXpBNhzjQ/edit#
Vote on Doodle to pick the meeting week.
Now vote on Doodle to pick a specific date.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: