You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fenced frames recently got feedback from the TAG that shared storage seemed like an explicit dependency of the fenced frame specification due to some of the shared-storage-specific APIs appearing in that specification:
If fenced frames has the opportunity to ascend to something like the WHATWG before this specification, for example, then the fenced frame feature should probably not normatively include APIs that are specific to this feature. Therefore I think it's best if the bits above were specified in the shared storage spec as extensions of the fenced frame specification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fenced frames recently got feedback from the TAG that shared storage seemed like an explicit dependency of the fenced frame specification due to some of the shared-storage-specific APIs appearing in that specification:
If fenced frames has the opportunity to ascend to something like the WHATWG before this specification, for example, then the fenced frame feature should probably not normatively include APIs that are specific to this feature. Therefore I think it's best if the bits above were specified in the shared storage spec as extensions of the fenced frame specification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: