-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify abstract and move credential types to introduction. #82
Changes from all commits
923c924
e69c8eb
a3ce7b7
91fb51d
25f847c
30eea7f
fdba0c7
f874881
100094d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -42,15 +42,12 @@ | |
<body data-cite="credential-management-1"> | ||
<section id="abstract"> | ||
<p> | ||
This document specifies an API to allow user agents to mediate access | ||
to, and representing, a verifiably-issued digital credential (e.g., a | ||
government issued digital driver's license, a passport issued by a | ||
country, a student card or diploma issued by a university, an employee | ||
card issued by a company, a passenger's boarding pass issued by an | ||
airline, a profile issued by an online social network, membership | ||
cards, vaccination records, etc) license). The API builds on | ||
[[[credential-management-1]]] as a means to request a digital | ||
credential from the user agent or underlying platform. | ||
This document specifies an API to enable [=user agents=] to mediate | ||
access to, and presentation of, digital credentials such as a driver's | ||
license, government-issued identification card, and/or [=credential type | ||
examples|other types of digital credential=]. The API builds on | ||
[[[credential-management-1]]] as a means by which to request a digital | ||
credential from a user agent or underlying platform. | ||
</p> | ||
</section> | ||
<section id="sotd"> | ||
|
@@ -64,6 +61,19 @@ <h2> | |
<p> | ||
TBW | ||
</p> | ||
<p id="credential-type-examples"> | ||
There are many types of digital credential that can be conveyed using | ||
this API. <dfn data-lt="credential type examples"> | ||
Examples of these types</dfn> include: | ||
</p> | ||
<ul> | ||
<li> | ||
a driver's license or identity card issued by a government institution | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm hesitant to include these at the moment because we haven't really looked at supporting these and I don't think any implementer supports these yet... though these could be supported, I'm worried about set expectations. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I moved many of these examples down from the text that already existed in the abstract; I was attempting to preserve text that already existed. If you want to remove it, that's fine, though the utility of the API becomes less interesting for a variety of stakeholders that are watching this work closely. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 to marcos. I understand you just moved the text, but mentioning passports in this file, either here or in the intro could be sensitive. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Reduced the list down to the only credential type we have consensus on right now: 06271a7. Preserved the full list in #85 (comment). |
||
TBW: other credential types | ||
</li> | ||
</ul> | ||
<h2> | ||
Model | ||
</h2> | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in general, share a lot of the same sentiment as expressed by @marcoscaceres. One suggestion would be to remove any specific references to the credential types in this PR, and than re-add them once we have more agreement in issue #85
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reduced the list down to the only credential type we have consensus on right now: 06271a7. Preserved the full list in #85 (comment).