You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
Good morning all,
while I appreciate that WDRT is no longer being developed, I would still try to share a doubt I have related to the fatigue calculation example in example_fatigue.py.
My doubt is related to how the 1-year DEL is calculated - starting from the 1-hour DELs.
In line 40 of the code, you sum up the contributions to the 1-year DEL as:
where N1h is the average number of cycles in 1 hour. I wonder why you don't multiply this by 24 * 365, which is the number of hours in one year, to get the 1-year damage contribution of Feq_1h[i][j].
I came across this doubt when looking at the DEL of 1.04 MN you calculate in the example, which looks a bit low - in 8 out of 9 cells of the scatter diagram (75% of occurrences), the 1-hour DEL is higher than the calculated DEL, which makes me think that the 1-year DEL should be somehow larger than 1.04 MN.
Thanks in advance for your patience and kindness.
Best regards
Michele Martini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good morning all,
while I appreciate that WDRT is no longer being developed, I would still try to share a doubt I have related to the fatigue calculation example in example_fatigue.py.
My doubt is related to how the 1-year DEL is calculated - starting from the 1-hour DELs.
In line 40 of the code, you sum up the contributions to the 1-year DEL as:
where N1h is the average number of cycles in 1 hour. I wonder why you don't multiply this by 24 * 365, which is the number of hours in one year, to get the 1-year damage contribution of Feq_1h[i][j].
I came across this doubt when looking at the DEL of 1.04 MN you calculate in the example, which looks a bit low - in 8 out of 9 cells of the scatter diagram (75% of occurrences), the 1-hour DEL is higher than the calculated DEL, which makes me think that the 1-year DEL should be somehow larger than 1.04 MN.
Thanks in advance for your patience and kindness.
Best regards
Michele Martini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: