Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spectral Panel - Intralipid Phantom MuA inaccurate #22

Open
ccampb19 opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Spectral Panel - Intralipid Phantom MuA inaccurate #22

ccampb19 opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ccampb19
Copy link

ccampb19 commented Jul 2, 2019

Since water makes up the majority of the intralipid absorption spectrum, I would expect to see a water peak at 970nm. Also, I believe the peak at 700nm is spurious. At least, I don't see this peak in my nigrosin spectra or the lipid spectrum we use, or in my Intralipid measurements. Perhaps it's related to the water problem.

image

@dcuccia
Copy link

dcuccia commented Jul 2, 2019

Interesting, thanks Chris. What does it look like if you back down nigrosin to near zero, e.g. 0.0001?

@ccampb19
Copy link
Author

ccampb19 commented Jul 2, 2019

Hey David. It's the same curve, scaled.
image

@dcuccia
Copy link

dcuccia commented Jul 2, 2019

Thanks. Looks like water is not in there at all. With an IL vol fraction of 0.01, the water fraction should be 0.99, resulting in an absorption of about 0.05/mm at roughly 970nm.

@ccampb19
Copy link
Author

ccampb19 commented Jul 2, 2019

Right, and the water spectrum works in a custom tissue -- but then there's no nigrosin available to add.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants