-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Buildscript support for coreclr runtime and classlibrary building #3
Conversation
….ps1 directly instead to keep the artifact copying.
* Trigger current yamato targets on PRs so at least something runs :-) * Add classlib building. Currently leverages perl but not enthusiastic about it.
.yamato/scripts/build_classlibs.bat
Outdated
ECHO taskkill /IM "dotnet.exe" /F | ||
taskkill /IM "dotnet.exe" /F | ||
echo build.cmd -clean | ||
build.cmd -clean |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've seen this hang once if the build fails... not sure if it was a fluke or there's something wrong in here.
.yamato/scripts/build_classlibs.bat
Outdated
) | ||
if not exist "incomingbuilds/coreclrjit-%%x" mkdir "incomingbuilds/coreclrjit-%%x" | ||
ECHO xcopy /s /e /h /y "artifacts/bin/runtime/net7.0-%%x-Release-x64" "incomingbuilds/coreclrjit-%%x" | ||
xcopy /s /e /h /y "artifacts/bin/runtime/net7.0-%%x-Release-x64" "incomingbuilds/coreclrjit-%%x" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can create "functions" in batch files so we don't have to repeat these commands twice:
If you add this label to the end of the file
:EchoAndExecute
ECHO %*
CALL %*
GOTO :EOF
Then we can do
CALL :EchoAndExecute xcopy /s /e /h /y "artifacts/bin/runtime/net7.0-%%x-Release-x64" "incomingbuilds/coreclrjit-%%x"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea I'll try that
* Initial implementation for contract customization fix build errors Move converter rooting to DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver so that it can be used standalone Fix ConfigurationList.IsReadOnly Minor refactorings (#1) * Makes the following changes: * Move singleton initialization for DefaultTypeInfoResolver behind a static property. * Consolidate JsonSerializerContext & IJsonTypeInfoResolver values to a single field. * Move reflection fallback logic away from JsonSerializerContext and into JsonSerializerOptions * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonSerializerOptions.cs * remove testing of removed field Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation (#2) * Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <[email protected]> Tests and fixes for JsonTypeInfoKind.None TypeInfo type mismatch tests Allow setting NumberHandling on JsonTypeInfoKind.None test resolver returning wrong type of options JsonTypeInfo/JsonPropertyInfo mutability tests rename test file Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver (#3) * Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver * address feedback Add simple test for using JsonTypeInfo<T> with APIs directly taking it fix and tests for untyped/typed CreateObject uncomment test cases, remove todo More tests and tiny fixes Add a JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine test for JsonSerializerContext (#4) * Fix JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine for JsonSerializerContext * Break up failing test Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts (#6) * Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts * feedback JsonSerializerContext combine test with different camel casing Remove unneeded virtual calls & branching when accessing Get & Set delegates (#7) JsonPropertyInfo tests everything minus ShouldSerialize & NumberHandling Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs throw InvalidOperationException rather than ArgumentNullException for source gen when PropertyInfo.Name is assigned through JsonPropertyInfoValues tests for duplicated property names and JsonPropertyInfo.NumberHandling Add tests for NumberHandling and failing tests for ShouldSerialize disable the failing test and add extra checks disable remainder of the failing ShouldSerialize tests, fix working one Fix ShouldSerialize and IgnoreCondition interop Add failing tests for CreateObject + parametrized constructors Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types (#10) * Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types * address feedback Make contexts more combinator friendly (#9) * Make contexts more combinator friendly * remove converter cache * redesign test to account for JsonConstructorAttribute * Combine unit tests * address feedback * Add acceptance tests for DataContract attributes & Specified pattern (#11) * Add private field serialization acceptance test (#13) * tests, PR feedback (#14) * PR feedback and extra tests * Shorten class name, remove incorrect check (not true for polimorphic cases) * Make parameter matching for custom properties map property Name with parameter (#16) * Test static initialization with JsonTypeInfo (#17) * Fix test failures and proper fix this time (#18) * Fix test failures and proper fix this time * reinstate ActiveIssueAttribute * PR feedback and adjust couple of tests which don't set TypeInfoResolver * fix IAsyncEnumerable tests * Lock JsonSerializerOptions in JsonTypeInfo.EnsureConfigured() Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <[email protected]>
…tnet#87189) This fixes a startup crash on Big Sur: > error: * Assertion at /Users/runner/work/1/s/src/mono/mono/utils/mono-hwcap-arm64.c:35, condition `res == 0' not met Because sysctl can't find some of these options: $ sysctl hw.optional.armv8_crc32 hw.optional.armv8_crc32: 1 $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_RDM sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_RDM' $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_DotProd sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_DotProd' $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA1 sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA1' $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA256 sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA256' $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_AES sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_AES' Full stack trace: * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 2.1 * frame #0: 0x0000010ef37560 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`monoeg_assertion_message frame #1: 0x0000010ef375cc libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_assertion_message + 32 frame #2: 0x0000010ef40d6c libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_hwcap_arch_init + 544 frame #3: 0x0000010ef54bd8 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_hwcap_init + 72 frame #4: 0x0000010ee14dc0 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`parse_optimizations + 52 frame #5: 0x0000010edbed48 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_init frame #6: 0x0000010ee18968 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_jit_init_version frame #7: 0x0000010f48a300 libxamarin-dotnet-debug.dylib`xamarin_bridge_initialize + 216 frame #8: 0x0000010f4900a4 libxamarin-dotnet-debug.dylib`xamarin_main + 376
…#102133) This generalizes the indir reordering optimization (that currently only triggers for loads) to kick in for GT_STOREIND nodes. The main complication with doing this is the fact that the data node of the second indirection needs its own reordering with the previous indirection. The existing logic works by reordering all nodes between the first and second indirection that are unrelated to the second indirection's computation to happen after it. Once that is done we know that there are no uses of the first indirection's result between it and the second indirection, so after doing the necessary interference checks we can safely move the previous indirection to happen after the data node of the second indirection. Example: ```csharp class Body { public double x, y, z, vx, vy, vz, mass; } static void Advance(double dt, Body[] bodies) { foreach (Body b in bodies) { b.x += dt * b.vx; b.y += dt * b.vy; b.z += dt * b.vz; } } ``` Diff: ```diff @@ -1,18 +1,17 @@ -G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x001C +G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x0020 ldr x3, [x0, w1, UXTW #3] ldp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08] ldp d18, d19, [x3, #0x20] fmul d18, d0, d18 fadd d16, d16, d18 - str d16, [x3, #0x08] - fmul d16, d0, d19 - fadd d16, d17, d16 - str d16, [x3, #0x10] + fmul d18, d0, d19 + fadd d17, d17, d18 + stp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08] ldr d16, [x3, #0x18] ldr d17, [x3, #0x30] fmul d17, d0, d17 fadd d16, d16, d17 str d16, [x3, #0x18] add w1, w1, #1 cmp w2, w1 bgt G_M55007_IG04 ```
No description provided.