Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

insights on noise in got dataset and fine-tuning issues #234

Open
ep0p opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

insights on noise in got dataset and fine-tuning issues #234

ep0p opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ep0p
Copy link

ep0p commented Dec 4, 2024

After re-reading the GOT paper, I’d like more insight into how noise or document quality was handled during training. For example, was there any focus on the percentage of pdf documents from Common Crawl that were distorted or noisy?

In my experiments, adding noise to 40% of the documents during fine-tuning still results in hallucinations during inference. Should I increase that margin, or would starting training from scratch be a better approach?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant