Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is vanilla ControlNet effective for PuLID without tuning? #176

Open
WinKawaks opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Is vanilla ControlNet effective for PuLID without tuning? #176

WinKawaks opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@WinKawaks
Copy link

Hi! Thank you for the great work!

This paper introduces a contrastive alignment loss and ID loss to minimize the contamination of ID information on the original model while ensuring fidelity. So the generated results are very similar to SDXL Lightning but still preserve the ID consistency. If so, I think the vanilla ControlNet for SDXL Lightning should work well with PuLID without tuning or only a few iterations tuning. Is this correct?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant