Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix exact indexing values for half-window calculations #230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2019

Conversation

kstrafe
Copy link
Contributor

@kstrafe kstrafe commented Sep 1, 2019

The previous patches would erroneously skip the value 32767 and drop the
next packet (32768). This patch and test ensures that this doesn't
happen.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #230 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.54%   97.56%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        2486     2504      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits         2425     2443      +18     
  Misses         61       61
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/infrastructure/arranging/ordering.rs 99.32% <100%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d93fc01...c6b417b. Read the comment docs.

The previous patches would erroneously skip the value 32767 and drop the
next packet (32768). This patch and test ensures that this doesn't
happen.
@TimonPost TimonPost merged commit d583916 into TimonPost:master Sep 2, 2019
jstnlef pushed a commit to jstnlef/laminar that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
The previous patches would erroneously skip the value 32767 and drop the
next packet (32768). This patch and test ensures that this doesn't
happen.
jstnlef pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
The previous patches would erroneously skip the value 32767 and drop the
next packet (32768). This patch and test ensures that this doesn't
happen.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants