You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't really have any specific information about this issue, other than that sending a few hundred 1K packets at once causes packet corruption. I would have imagined that laminar would automatically handle high throughput like this and not allow data through fast enough to cause packet corruption.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think that this is a duplicate of #134. Hopefully, this is solved by resenting changes we made an still are making: #177. If that code is merged we will definably research this issue further.
Can you report in that issue the following information:
Platform
Reliability / Ordering packet type
Payload size
But I am going to close this issue in favor of #134
I don't really have any specific information about this issue, other than that sending a few hundred 1K packets at once causes packet corruption. I would have imagined that
laminar
would automatically handle high throughput like this and not allow data through fast enough to cause packet corruption.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: