Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test before the demo #32

Open
ftm-2005 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 12 comments
Open

test before the demo #32

ftm-2005 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 12 comments

Comments

@ftm-2005
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

Issue Link: eclipse-openj9/openj9#19472
Title: Ensure all necessary cached JITServer AOT cache records are valid during deserialization
Actual Components: comp:jitserver
Recommended Components: comp:vm, comp:test, comp:gc
Actual Assignees: mpirvu
Recommended Assignees: gacholio, fengxue-IS, babsingh

Issue Link: eclipse-openj9/openj9#19584
Title: Enabled AOT cache at server by default
Actual Components: comp:jitserver
Recommended Components: comp:vm, comp:build, comp:test
Actual Assignees: mpirvu
Recommended Assignees: hangshao0, JasonFengJ9, babsingh

Issue Link: eclipse-openj9/openj9#19366
Title: jdk23 concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase crash vmState=0x00000000
Actual Components: comp:vm, test failure, jdk23
Recommended Components: comp:vm, comp:gc, comp:test
Actual Assignees: babsingh
Recommended Assignees: pshipton, fengxue-IS, ChengJin01

Issue Link: eclipse-openj9/openj9#19470
Title: AArch64: Remove obsolete JIT helper entries for arraycopy
Actual Components: comp:jit, arch:aarch64
Recommended Components: comp:vm, comp:gc, comp:test
Actual Assignees: 0xdaryl
Recommended Assignees: gacholio, keithc-ca, amicic

Issue Link: eclipse-openj9/openj9#19390
Title: Tests missing native tag
Actual Components: good first issue, comp:test
Recommended Components: comp:test, comp:vm, comp:build
Actual Assignees: rohit-satya
Recommended Assignees: llxia, pshipton, babsingh

@coolujain
Copy link
Collaborator

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19366

Copy link

Issue Summary:

The provided error message indicates a segmentation error during a test in the JSR166TestCase class in the ForkJoinPool-Common-Parallelism. This error is likely caused by a thread attempting to access a memory address that is outside of its assigned address space. The affected code could be related to the Java_util_concurrent_tck package and the libpthread.so.0 library. To resolve this issue, it is recommended to review the code for possible memory access violations and to check the compatibility of the hardware and architecture being used. Further insights could be gathered by analyzing the stack backtrace and understanding the modules involved.

@coolujain
Copy link
Collaborator

TriagerX /summarize -gemini eclipse-openj9/openj9#19366

Copy link

Error Summary:

Error: The OpenJ9 JVM crashed with a Segmentation Fault (SIGSEGV) during a test in the jdk23 concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase suite.

Potential Root Cause: The crash occurs during the testAbnormalQuietlyInvoke test and involves the pthread_mutex_lock function, suggesting a potential issue with thread synchronization and mutex locks. The ForkJoinPool implementation in the JSR166TestCase is the most likely culprit.

Affected Code:

  • java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#forkjoinpool-common-parallelism
  • The ForkJoinPool implementation and its interactions with the pthread_mutex_lock function.

Debugging Steps:

  1. Analyze the stack trace: Examine the provided stack trace for potential errors in the ForkJoinPool implementation, specifically in the context of the pthread_mutex_lock call.
  2. Review relevant code: Investigate the ForkJoinPool implementation and its interactions with thread synchronization mechanisms (including mutex locks).
  3. Inspect memory allocation: Analyze memory allocation patterns around the crash to identify potential memory corruption or out-of-bounds access.
  4. Test with different configurations: Run the test suite with different JVM options and thread configurations to isolate the issue.
  5. Utilize debugging tools: Leverage debuggers like GDB to step through the code and investigate the state of the JVM and its internal structures at the time of the crash.

Insights:

  • The crash is a segmentation fault, indicating that the JVM attempted to access a memory location that it was not authorized to access.
  • The pthread_mutex_lock function is involved, suggesting potential issues with thread synchronization, race conditions, or corrupted mutex states.
  • This error occurs on AArch64, highlighting the importance of cross-architecture testing.

Additional Notes: The provided logs include information about the JVM version, CPU, and operating system, which might help to identify platform-specific issues. It is important to analyze the logs and code carefully to determine the root cause and implement an appropriate fix.

@Belami02
Copy link
Contributor

TriagerX /recommend -triagerx eclipse-openj9/openj9#19366

@Belami02
Copy link
Contributor

TriagerX /interact -chatgpt What have we discussed so far?

Copy link

We have discussed an issue in the OpenJ9 project (#19366) related to a segmentation fault during a test in the jdk23 concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase suite. The crash involves the pthread_mutex_lock function, indicating a potential issue with thread synchronization and mutex locks in the ForkJoinPool implementation. Debugging steps and potential root causes were also outlined to address and resolve the issue effectively.

@Belami02
Copy link
Contributor

TriagerX /interact -gemini What have we discussed so far?

Copy link

We have been discussing GitHub issue #19366 in the OpenJ9 project. This issue involves a crash in the jdk23 concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase suite, specifically during the testAbnormalQuietlyInvoke test. The crash is a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and appears to be related to the pthread_mutex_lock function, suggesting potential problems with thread synchronization and mutex locks.

We analyzed the error, pinpointing the potential root cause to the ForkJoinPool implementation and its interactions with the pthread_mutex_lock function. We also identified several steps that can be taken to debug the issue, such as analyzing the stack trace, reviewing the relevant code, and using debugging tools.

Overall, we have identified the issue, outlined its potential root cause, and suggested several approaches to debug and resolve the issue.

@Belami02
Copy link
Contributor

TriagerX /interact -gemini Hello! Who are you?

Copy link

I am a large language model, trained by Google.

What can I do for you today?

I can:

  • Answer your questions in a comprehensive and informative way, even if they are open ended, challenging, or strange.
  • Generate different creative text formats, like poems, code, scripts, musical pieces, email, letters, etc. I will try my best to fulfill all your requirements.
  • Translate languages.
  • Write different kinds of creative content.

Let me know how I can help! 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants