Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first issue #1

Closed
GioChkhaidze opened this issue Jun 9, 2024 · 22 comments
Closed

first issue #1

GioChkhaidze opened this issue Jun 9, 2024 · 22 comments

Comments

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19597

2 similar comments
@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19597

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19597

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19652

1 similar comment
@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19652

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Please provide the issue title and description. I need these details to understand the error and provide a helpful summary.

Once you provide the information, I can help you with:

  • A clear explanation of the error: I'll break down the error message into simpler terms, explaining what it means in the context of OpenJ9.
  • Potential root causes: I'll identify possible reasons why this error might be occurring, based on my knowledge of the OpenJ9 codebase.
  • Specific areas of the code that might be affected: I'll pinpoint the relevant sections of the OpenJ9 code that could be causing the issue.
  • Recommended steps for debugging and resolving the issue: I'll suggest specific debugging strategies and potential solutions, tailored to the error and OpenJ9's architecture.
  • Additional insights: I'll offer additional context and information that can help the development team understand the problem more deeply.

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -gemini eclipse-openj9/openj9#19629

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Please provide the Issue Title and Issue Description so I can summarize the error message, identify potential root causes, and offer debugging and resolution advice.

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -gemini eclipse-openj9/openj9#19629

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Please provide me with the Issue Title and Issue Description for the OpenJ9 project error message. I need this information to be able to summarize the error, identify potential root causes, and suggest debugging steps.

Once you provide the details, I can help you understand the problem and recommend solutions.

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -gemini eclipse-openj9/openj9#19629

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Summary of "Improve JITServer/test compatibility with JITAAS"

Error: When running JITServer tests with the TEST_FLAG=JITAAS flag, a single JITServer instance is started at the beginning and remains active throughout the entire test run. This causes incompatibility with the -X[no]compressedrefs JVM option, as the client and server must agree on its usage to connect. Tests with -Xnocompressedrefs will not utilize the JITServer.

Root Cause: The current approach of starting a single JITServer for the entire test run does not allow for dynamic adaptation to individual test's JVM options, specifically -Xnocompressedrefs.

Affected Code: The JITServer test infrastructure, specifically the code handling the setup and teardown of the JITServer instances and the test execution process.

Debugging and Resolution:

  1. Individualized JITServer Setup: Implement a mechanism to start a fresh JITServer instance for each test individually. This allows adapting the server's configuration to the specific JVM options of each test.
  2. Check for -Xnocompressedrefs: In the test setup, check if -Xnocompressedrefs is included in the JVM options

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -gemini eclipse-openj9/openj9#19629

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Error Summary:

Error: The current implementation of the JITServer in OpenJ9 doesn't work well with the -X[no]compressedrefs JVM option when testing with JITAAS. A single JITServer instance is started at the beginning of the test run and remains active until the end, causing issues when tests use -Xnocompressedrefs because the client and server need to agree on this setting.

Root Cause: The incompatibility stems from the fixed JITServer instance that doesn't adapt to changing JVM options like -Xnocompressedrefs across different tests.

Affected Code:

  • JITServer: The current code responsible for starting and managing the JITServer instance needs to be adjusted to dynamically adapt to JVM options.
  • JITAAS Tests: The testing framework needs to handle the creation and termination of JITServer instances on a per-test basis.

Debugging and Resolution:

  1. Modify JITServer: Implement a mechanism to dynamically create and destroy JITServer instances per test, passing the appropriate JVM options (including -Xnocompressedrefs) to each instance.
  2. Update JITAAS Tests: Modify the JITAAS test framework to start and stop

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19629

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Error Summary:

  • The issue involves incompatibility between JITServer and JITAAS when -X[no]compressedrefs options are used.
  • The main cause of the incompatibility is that the JITServer and client must agree on the same value for the -Xcompressedrefs option in order to connect with each other.
  • The specific area of code affected is in the JITServer test run, where a single instance is started and stays until the end of the run.
  • Recommended steps for debugging and resolving the issue include checking for -Xnocompressedrefs in the JVM options, starting a fresh JITServer instance with the correct option, and killing the JITServer after the test finishes.
  • Additional insights suggest checking for compatibility between client and server after the test finishes to ensure the server did not crash during the test.

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /summarize -chatgpt eclipse-openj9/openj9#19597

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /interact -gemini How are you?

4 similar comments
@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /interact -gemini How are you?

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /interact -gemini How are you?

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /interact -gemini How are you?

@GioChkhaidze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TriagerX /interact -gemini How are you?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants