Cannot plot CategoricalValue Variables

[drizk1]

Describe the bug
When trying to plot a a categorical CategoricalValue{String, UInt32} (or any CategoricalValue) variable the following error occurs

ERROR: ArgumentError: cannot compare a `CategoricalValue` to value `v` of type `Float64`: wrap `v` using `CategoricalValue(v, catvalue)` or `CategoricalValue(v, catarray)` first
Stacktrace:
  [1] isless(x::CategoricalValue{String, UInt32}, y::Float64)
    @ CategoricalArrays ~/.julia/packages/CategoricalArrays/0yLZN/src/value.jl:153
  [2] min(x::Float64, y::CategoricalValue{String, UInt32})
    @ Base ./operators.jl:490
  [3] (::Makie.var"#1100#1106"{Makie.var"#1100#1101#1107"{Symbol}})(plot::TidierPlots.GGPlot)
    @ TidierPlots ~/.julia/packages/TidierPlots/LtsvY/src/draw.jl:92
  [4] draw_ggplot(plot::TidierPlots.GGPlot)
    @ TidierPlots ~/.julia/packages/TidierPlots/LtsvY/src/draw.jl:226
  [5] (::TidierPlots.var"#211#212"{TidierPlots.GGPlot})()
    @ TidierPlots ~/.julia/packages/TidierPlots/LtsvY/src/show.jl:76
  [6] (::Makie.var"#315#316"{@Kwargs{}, TidierPlots.var"#211#212"{TidierPlots.GGPlot}, MakieCore.Attributes})()
    @ Makie ~/.julia/packages/Makie/8h0bl/src/theming.jl:232
  [7] lock(f::Makie.var"#315#316"{@Kwargs{}, TidierPlots.var"#211#212"{TidierPlots.GGPlot}, MakieCore.Attributes}, l::ReentrantLock)

but it will work as a string

To Reproduce

using TidierCats, TidierPlots
using Random
Random.seed!(10)
categories = ["High", "Medium", "Low", "Zilch"];
random_indices = rand(1:length(categories), 57);
df = DataFrame(
    ID = 1:57,
    CatVar = categorical([categories[i] for i in random_indices], levels = categories));

ggplot(df) + 
 geom_bar(@aes(x = CatVar))

Expected behavior

Ideally it would graph the graph.

Screenshots

df.CatVar = string.(df.CatVar)

ggplot(df) + 
 geom_bar(@aes(x = CatVar))

Additional context

Status `~/.julia/environments/v1.10/Project.toml`
  [337ecbd1] TidierPlots v0.7.8 `https://github.com/TidierOrg/TidierPlots.jl#main

[drizk1]

@rdboyes I took a shot at solving this.. but came up short. I wonder if it's related to the dates issue?

[rdboyes]

Fixed by #118 !