You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I assume that for the clock plots, the 'after lockdown' subplot also takes into account data after there is a potential lifting of the lockdown situation. In these cases, such as in China, where the noise level has risen back to pre-lockdown levels, I am just wondering if the comparison between before and after can be a little bit biased by a long end-of-lockdown period.
Maybe we a separate variable, like the bans dict to set end of lockdown dates?
Please say if this isn't clear!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I assume that for the clock plots, the 'after lockdown' subplot also takes into account data after there is a potential lifting of the lockdown situation. In these cases, such as in China, where the noise level has risen back to pre-lockdown levels, I am just wondering if the comparison between before and after can be a little bit biased by a long end-of-lockdown period.
Maybe we a separate variable, like the
bans
dict to set end of lockdown dates?Please say if this isn't clear!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: