Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Admintoolbox.Fortiwizard - New-SDWANTunnel #91

Open
TheTaylorLee opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Admintoolbox.Fortiwizard - New-SDWANTunnel #91

TheTaylorLee opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@TheTaylorLee
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Priority: Low

Comments

@TheTaylorLee
Copy link
Owner

TheTaylorLee commented Oct 20, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Feature Target Details

  • Module Name: Admintoolbox.Fortiwizard
  • Existing Function: New-Formtunnel
  • New Function Name: New-SDWANP2PTunnel, New-SDWANP2PNATTunnel, New-SDWANDialUPTunnelBehindNAT, New-SDWANDialUPTunnelRemoteNAT

Describe the solution you'd like
Expand FortWizard to support tunnels built with SD-WAN interfaces. Consider redundant tunnels, dialup tunnels, and standard ipsec tunnels.

Why is this change needed?
So that this module can be used for building new tunnels even when working with FortiGates that are setup in an SD-WAN configuration.

Additional context
Must test with real world configuration prior to being able to write these functions. Hopefully soon! Extra functions will be required for managing zone membership and more.

https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Configure-IPsec-VPN-with-SD-WAN/ta-p/209840
@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee added enhancement New feature or request Priority: Medium labels Oct 20, 2022
@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee self-assigned this Oct 20, 2022
@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee added Priority: Low wontfix This will not be worked on and removed Priority: Medium labels Jan 30, 2023
@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee reopened this Apr 26, 2023
@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Apr 26, 2023
@TheTaylorLee
Copy link
Owner Author

If using redundant tunnels, I might consider including performance SLA options, or I might just provide an example.

@TheTaylorLee
Copy link
Owner Author

VPN Overlay https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.2.4/administration-guide/391857/vpn-overlay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@TheTaylorLee TheTaylorLee

Labels
enhancement New feature or request Priority: Low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@TheTaylorLee