-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Knights Travails: Handle the concept of a graph more explicitly with new project #28487
Comments
I strongly agree with you, I had no idea how I was supposed to have done KT until way after I finished it. I've just never been sure what to do differently about it because I think it is a very valuable project even though I've seen a lot of people with that same problem. I like the idea of a more abstract graph project to warm up and am on board with your proposal, but before you proceed I'd like to see if any other @TheOdinProject/maintainers object. |
I think it's potentially a cool idea, but I'd also be interested in seeing what this would like. One of the "challenges" maybe is that unlike the other structures talked about, graphs are very abstract and can have several different concrete implementations (which is why people can solve Knight Travails in a bunch of different ways). |
I think it could be like this: Assignment begins - specify the implementation they should use for the exercise |
Just did this problem yesterday, and had to go to Reddit and StackOverflow to have a better idea on how to solve. Looking back, what are your thoughts around:
|
This issue is stale because it has had no activity for the last 30 days. |
My thoughts are that graphs is such a big topic we probably need more material to cover it for sure and at least one other project so I'm not against a warm up project where the focus is graph abstraction. |
This issue is stale because it has had no activity for the last 30 days. |
@damon314159 it seems nobody has voiced opposition to the idea, is this still something you're interested in doing? |
Yes, I'm still interested in pursuing it |
Have at it! Thanks! |
This issue is stale because it has had no activity for the last 30 days. |
Checks
Describe your suggestion
I think that graphs are a structure that are very much swept under the rug in the current iteration of KT.
The linked list and hashmap projects have you define a class that can be used to instantiate and work with a structure, but apply no "real world" context to it. I think this makes you think abstractly about what you're representing and how.
Then you get to KT, where graphs are introduced more like an aside to the specific knight problem, and so learners aren't thinking about using a graph to solve a problem, they're thinking about a horse and trying to figure out what a graph has to do with it.
I think it could be really beneficial to make an abstract graph project, which can have the learner make a class, give it some methods and such. Then after that you can have the KT project, and the hint at the top that you will need to use a graph is much more meaningful - and serves as an example of how these abstract structures could solve a 'real' problem
I'd be up for working on this but to make it at reasonable quality is unlikely to be a speedy process
Path
Ruby / Rails, Node / JS
Lesson Url
https://www.theodinproject.com/lessons/javascript-knights-travails
(Optional) Discord Name
No response
(Optional) Additional Comments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: