Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Requesting re-license clearance for our open source RPGItems fork #19

Open
Librazy opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Librazy
Copy link

Librazy commented Jul 18, 2018

Dear @TheCreeperOfRedstone and @Mowstyl ,

Words are powerless to express my gratitude. Thanks you for bringing us such a powerful plugin which I'm devoting to.

We maintains our own fork at RPGitems-reloaded. As for a part of the spigot-1.13 update of this plugin, we are considering add some programmable interface to it. For the sake of allowing more developer and project to use it, we are considering change RPGitems-reloaded from GPLv3 to some license that are lesser restrictive than GPLv3, such as Apache License 2.0 or The MIT License. So we are requesting clearance from you, the creators of RPGItems.

If you give us the permission to re-license RPGitems-reloaded to other open source license, we will inform you before and after the transition again once we received clearance from all the contributors and decided which license is best choice for RPGitems-reloaded.

We will always open source our fork and develop it with our best effort. The re-license will create more rooms for more developers to involve in RPGitems. We can create expansion for RPGitems more easily and with less restriction.

If you or some of other contributors think GPLv3 is the right decision, we will remain at GPLv3.

Your copyright was, is, and will be consistently and fully respected.

Best Regards,
The NyaaCat Developers

@SirDabs
Copy link

SirDabs commented Jul 19, 2018

I believe this would be 100% Ok. Im not the sole contributor to this but i dont think there would be an issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants