Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about repertoire coverage/bias #98

Open
jfx319 opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

question about repertoire coverage/bias #98

jfx319 opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jfx319
Copy link

jfx319 commented Dec 20, 2019

Hello,

I have a naive question about whether all VDJs have equal chance to be detected.

How do you know whether there is any bias in covering the theoretical VDJ repertoire, and if so, how much can be explained by the nature of the wetlab technique (e.g. chromium VDJ primers, or BIOMED2 primers choosing a restricted set of VJ primers), versus downstream challenges (the assembly algorithm, genomic loci similarity unresolved by short reads). I'm not sure what the proper gold standard here would be: high depth bulk RNAseq on enriched Tcells? tabulations of counts across all theoretical VJ pairings according to IMGT?

EDIT: I should add that on reading through the tracer paper and supplementary notes, I still had this question.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant