Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Set Scenario only Shows Monsters in Starting Section #170

Open
Jeremiah1 opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@Jeremiah1
Copy link

When I set a scenario, I would like the app to only show the monsters in the starting section and auto-add their standees. Do not add the monsters in unrevealed sections. This way, scenarios don't tip off what the group will be facing in the other sections. Once a section is revealed during game play, the user can click the appropriate section button to add the monsters.

@Jeremiah1 Jeremiah1 changed the title Feature Request: Set Scenario only Show Monsters in Starting Section Feature Request: Set Scenario only Shows Monsters in Starting Section May 23, 2023
@sigismond0
Copy link

Not relevant in Frosthaven at least, as dull monster load out is revealed during scenario setup.

@Tarmslitaren
Copy link
Owner

I think they would like the monster types to be a surprise, not according to RAW (except for Forgotten Circles) but as a houserule variation. I've seen this be asked for in other places.

Implementation wise, there's a few considerations:

  1. sections or monster auto population are options, so this feature would need to not break when those are off.
  2. some monsters spawn others, and those need to be considered as well.
  3. overall this whole feature could be done in just data files ( add monsters in sections instead of at start ), but all 400+ scenarios would need to be examined and changed for this, sections added for gloomhaven and jaws as well to deal with no standee option etc.

@treac
Copy link

treac commented Jan 28, 2025

I'm in the early game and don't know the special rules mentioned in the comment above the removed code.

But this achieves your request ... maybe until i start a mission with special rules ^^.

treac@6db25c1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants