You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Biologically, a single mRNA can lead to different CDSs (and therefore protein translations) due to alternative translational start sites. This is in fact allowed in the GFF3 standard: https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/Specifications/blob/master/gff3.md (look for "alternative translational start sites"). If a CDS is discountinuous, its fragments must use the same ID, so the ID can be used to group the fragments composing the various alternative CDSs.
Ensembl seem to enforce the "one CDS per transcript" rule in its databases, but we don't have to.
Additional problem: same GFF3 files (e.g. the one in the gstf_preparation tool help!) use different IDs for fragments of the same CDS, which I think is non-standard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in the
gstf_preparation
tool.Biologically, a single mRNA can lead to different CDSs (and therefore protein translations) due to alternative translational start sites. This is in fact allowed in the GFF3 standard: https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/Specifications/blob/master/gff3.md (look for "alternative translational start sites"). If a CDS is discountinuous, its fragments must use the same ID, so the ID can be used to group the fragments composing the various alternative CDSs.
Ensembl seem to enforce the "one CDS per transcript" rule in its databases, but we don't have to.
Additional problem: same GFF3 files (e.g. the one in the
gstf_preparation
tool help!) use different IDs for fragments of the same CDS, which I think is non-standard.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: