You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given TCN is 16 bytes long
A TCN changed every 15 minutes for 14 days gives a maximum of 1344 TCNs or 21.5kBytes maximum as there is no need to send the TCNs without contact. You can even set a maximum number of contacts per day (20 for example).
With 10,000 positive cases reported per day, this makes a file of 215 MB at the most, but rather less than 1 MB on average.
I don't see a problem for any HTTP server !
What would be the interest to change the TCNs declared for Covid+ to simulate a contact with a person whose TCN has been captured?
Since we choose not to report TCNs, we can not warn certain people.
So my question is
Would I be compatible if I stayed on a strawman protocol?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am proposing a protocol
https://github.com/pelinquin/kissact
that is more or less the strawman protocol and I don't see any scale issue.
Given TCN is 16 bytes long
A TCN changed every 15 minutes for 14 days gives a maximum of 1344 TCNs or 21.5kBytes maximum as there is no need to send the TCNs without contact. You can even set a maximum number of contacts per day (20 for example).
With 10,000 positive cases reported per day, this makes a file of 215 MB at the most, but rather less than 1 MB on average.
I don't see a problem for any HTTP server !
What would be the interest to change the TCNs declared for Covid+ to simulate a contact with a person whose TCN has been captured?
Since we choose not to report TCNs, we can not warn certain people.
So my question is
Would I be compatible if I stayed on a strawman protocol?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: