You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Only 4724 reaction out of 13069 has reaction names given in Human-GEM model. Although I can see the reaction codes from rxns list under the model, rxnNames list does not consists the majority of their names.
Expected feature/value/output:
All reactions to have their reaction names stated in rxnNames list.
Note: I tried to download the latest version manually as well for the model, but the reaction names are still missing.
I hereby confirm that I have:
Tested my code on my own computer for running the model
Done this analysis in the main branch of the repository
Checked that a similar issue does not exist already
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There have been long-standing issues regarding the reaction names, and only incremental have been made so far in #333 and #181.
If your question is open-ended, then we would love your input and suggestions in #181, in which case this issue could be closed. If you question, however, is more related to the reaction annotation, then it would be great if you could share more about your use-case.
Description of the issue:
Only 4724 reaction out of 13069 has reaction names given in Human-GEM model. Although I can see the reaction codes from rxns list under the model, rxnNames list does not consists the majority of their names.
Expected feature/value/output:
All reactions to have their reaction names stated in rxnNames list.
Note: I tried to download the latest version manually as well for the model, but the reaction names are still missing.
I hereby confirm that I have:
main
branch of the repositoryThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: