You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This SEP proposes improvements over SEP 19 which it hopes to replace. It introduces an Implementation class and prescribes how experimental results and workflow data can be recorded. The main difference is a somewhat simplified data model that relies less on prov-O (all use of providence ontology remains optional) and provides a more direct link from Experiment via Clone (implementation) to Sequence (ComponentDefinition). Moreover, although it supports the somewhat idealistic Design - Build - Test paradigm, the proposal tries to focus on more practical everyday use cases.
Since SEP 20 is really a fork of SEP 19, the authors of 19 should probably be added here. Please speak up to complain.
jakebeal
changed the title
SEP 20 -- Linking experimental results with Biological clones and replicates
SEP 020 -- Linking experimental results with Biological clones and replicates
Jun 19, 2018
This SEP proposes improvements over SEP 19 which it hopes to replace. It introduces an Implementation class and prescribes how experimental results and workflow data can be recorded. The main difference is a somewhat simplified data model that relies less on prov-O (all use of providence ontology remains optional) and provides a more direct link from Experiment via Clone (implementation) to Sequence (ComponentDefinition). Moreover, although it supports the somewhat idealistic Design - Build - Test paradigm, the proposal tries to focus on more practical everyday use cases.
Since SEP 20 is really a fork of SEP 19, the authors of 19 should probably be added here. Please speak up to complain.
Please review the proposal at:
https://github.com/SynBioDex/SEPs/blob/master/sep_020.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: