Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SEP 012 -- Any cardinality for Identified.wasDerivedFrom #27

Closed
jakebeal opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

SEP 012 -- Any cardinality for Identified.wasDerivedFrom #27

jakebeal opened this issue Dec 14, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor

This SEP allows Identified.wasDerivedFrom to have multiple sources of derivation.

Proposal document: https://github.com/SynBioDex/SEPs/blob/master/sep_012.md

@cjmyers
Copy link
Contributor

cjmyers commented Dec 14, 2016

I remember this discussion with Goksel now. When you say convert an NCBI sequence to SBOL, you can link the NCBI record using wasDerivedFrom, then optionally include an Activity object to indicate how it was derived. If you want to say that this SBOL object was actually derived from multiple records, it is best to use the Usage object as it enables you to specify a Role for each object. So, for example if you want to say this Sequence object was derived from another Sequence object and an NCBI record, you could create two Usage objects, one with Role “original record” and another with Role “previous SBOL record”. You can still include one of these in the wasDerivedFrom field, if you like.

Chris

@jakebeal jakebeal added Accepted and removed Draft labels Jan 6, 2017
@jakebeal jakebeal added the Final label Jan 17, 2017
@jakebeal jakebeal added this to the SBOL 2.2 milestone Jan 17, 2017
@jamesamcl jamesamcl reopened this Oct 11, 2018
@palchicz
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in accordance with changes to SEP issue tracking rules detailed in SEP 001 bcbbcab#diff-44cec2aabf4c066f9a54ac4ef6634b9b

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants