Use SwiftLint via CocoaPods #78
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Basically almost same remarks/questions as in SwiftGen/SwiftGen#401 😉
| - type_name | ||
|
|
||
| opt_in_rules: | ||
| - force_unwrapping |
| XCTAssertTrue(try Filters.parseBool(from: ["true"])!) | ||
| XCTAssertTrue(try Filters.parseBool(from: ["yes"])!) | ||
| XCTAssertTrue(try Filters.parseBool(from: ["1"])!) | ||
| // swiftlint:enable force_unwrapping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we should instead use XCTAssertTrue((try …) ?? false) or XCTAssertEquals(try …, true) to avoid the force-unwrap here? Especially, in case there's a regression one day and the test parseBool(from: ["true"]) starts to fail and return an unexpected nil, that force-unwrap will make the test harness crash and stop the whole test process, instead of marking that test as failed and continue with other test cases…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We'd have to be careful then to provide the "inverse" value as a fallback for each test. Here it's true, for the parseBool(from: ["false"]) it should be false, ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah that's why I'd prefer to use the more readable XCTAssertEquals(…, true) there rather than XCTAssertTrue(… ?? false)
| @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ machine: | |||
|
|
|||
| dependencies: | |||
| post: | |||
| - bundle exec rake lint:install | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same questions as in SwiftGen/SwiftGen#401 (comment)
rakelib/lint.rake
Outdated
| task :code do |task| | ||
| Utils.print_header 'Linting the code' | ||
| config = Pathname.getwd + '.swiftlint.yml' | ||
| Utils.run(%(#{SWIFTLINT} lint --strict --path Sources --config "#{config}"), task) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same q as in SwiftGen/SwiftGen#401 (comment)
djbe
force-pushed
the
feature/swiftlint-pod
branch
from
4879ab3 to
86ef8e2
Compare
Scripts/SwiftLint.sh
Outdated
| #!/bin/bash | ||
|
|
||
| SWIFTLINT="$(PWD)/Pods/SwiftLint/swiftlint" | ||
| CONFIG="$(PWD)/.swiftlint.yml" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same as SwiftGen/SwiftGen#401 (comment)
djbe
force-pushed
the
feature/swiftlint-pod
branch
from
ce85ba3 to
831d1a0
Compare
Same as SwiftGen/SwiftGen#401