Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question to self: should we "clean up" reduction steps #149

Closed
stephen-swensen opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Question to self: should we "clean up" reduction steps #149

stephen-swensen opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@stephen-swensen
Copy link
Contributor

Some issues like #118 #142 introduce the question: should we have a version of reduceFully or UnquotedExpression (perhaps as an option) that cleans up reduction steps? Namely,

  • strip out WithValue expressions entirely
  • rewrite final reduction as a Value if it isn't already
@stephen-swensen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we could add a clean operator which provides this operator as a post processing step which library user's may choose to use if they wish. But we could also choose to use it on the UnquoteExpression reductions (used by test operators), perhaps optionally by default

@stephen-swensen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing for lack of clarity + inactivty

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant