[BugFix] fix list partition multi values' probelm (backport #51036) #52571
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I'm doing:
if one partition column has multi values for one partition, like "PARTITION pCalifornia VALUES IN ("Los Angeles","San Francisco","San Diego")", then predicate like "city not in "Los Angeles" " can not be used to prune the whole partition.
What I'm doing:
Right now we don't support multi values partition's partition prune, so just forbid it for "not in" for the correctness of query.
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:
This is an automatic backport of pull request #51036 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing: if one partition column has multi values for one partition, like "PARTITION pCalifornia VALUES IN ("Los Angeles","San Francisco","San Diego")", then predicate like "city not in "Los Angeles" " can not be used to prune the whole partition.
What I'm doing:
Right now we don't support multi values partition's partition prune, so just forbid it for "not in" for the correctness of query.
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist: