Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found #97

Open
timabell opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found #97

timabell opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@timabell
Copy link

timabell commented Feb 9, 2025

Just for the record, I don't expect any fix for this but just wanted to note it for anyone else that ran into this.

I downloaded the current release, ran it and got this

╭─tim@fox ~/Downloads 
╰─$ ./roslyn-language-server
./roslyn-language-server: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by ./roslyn-language-server)
./roslyn-language-server: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by ./roslyn-language-server)
./roslyn-language-server: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by ./roslyn-language-server)
./roslyn-language-server: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by ./roslyn-language-server)

╭─tim@fox ~/Downloads 
╰─$ ldd --version
ldd (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.17) 2.31
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.

╭─tim@fox ~/Downloads 
╰─$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.2
DISTRIB_CODENAME=uma
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 20.2 Uma"

Seems like my OS is just too old, to be fair I need to rebuild this laptop.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65120136/lib64-libc-so-6-version-glibc-2-32-not-found

@SofusA
Copy link
Owner

SofusA commented Feb 10, 2025

Thanks for heads up.

I expect the this be the build agents Ubuntu version using a newer glibc version.

You could try to build from source instead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants