Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ImmGenData: discrepancies in cell ontology mapping? #9

Open
prepiscak opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

ImmGenData: discrepancies in cell ontology mapping? #9

prepiscak opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@prepiscak
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for the great package!

The idea of using label.ont is great, however I'm wondering how was the mapping to the Cell Ontology (label.ont) done in the ImmGenData (or in any other dataset)?

For some similar/identical labels there seems to be discrepancy in the ontology label. For example, this looks fine:
B cells (B.Fo) = CL:0000843 follicular B cell
B cells (B.FO) = CL:0000843 follicular B cell

however, the following ontology labels differ:
B cells (B.FrE) = CL:0002054 Fraction E immature B cell
B cells (B.FRE) = CL:0000236 B cell

B cells (preB.FrD) = CL:0002052 Fraction D precursor B cell
B cells (preB.FRD) = CL:0000817 precursor B cell

B cells (proB.FrBC) = CL:0002400 Fraction B/C precursor B cell
B cells (proB.FRBC) = CL:0000826 pro-B cell

Note: This is just an example, but there may be other discrepancies.

Thanks

@LTLA
Copy link
Member

LTLA commented Aug 26, 2021

I vaguely remember either me or @j-andrews7 doing it manually. Can't remember who did what.

You're welcome to submit a PR to fix any problems. It was pretty draining so attention may have slipped here and there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants