Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Player controls take too much space in landscape orientation #252

Open
elishamint opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Player controls take too much space in landscape orientation #252

elishamint opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@elishamint
Copy link

version 5.12.3, Android 11
When using the player on a normal smartphone screen in landscape orientation (the orientation I mainly use), the player controls take up way too much vertical space so that the file list is barely usable.

Screenshot_20240617-151020_Voice_Recorder

Suggestions for landscape specific layout:
(1) Move the tab switch buttons from the bottom in line with the search bar and settings and info button. Search is imo not needed to be permanently on screen ... items will perhaps anyway be moved to a drop-down menu in the future.
(2) drastically reduce the whitespace between the file list box and the seek bar. Leave just enough space for clumsy fingers and possibly for a future marker feature.
(3) Move the payer controls to the right/left (option?) of the seek bar. Reduce button size and whitespace around buttons by 1/3, possibly arrange them vertically (yes!).
-- or --
(4) Re-arrange the two panes (file list and player control) horizontally, as the list also has almost 50% whitespace. The seek bar could still get the whole width extending below the list, as this makes the landscape layout a convenience.

@Maxitendo1
Copy link

@elishamint SimpleMobileTools apps were sold to ad and spyware company. Fork is here:

https://github.com/FossifyOrg

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants