diff --git a/lib/tapioca/dsl/compilers/protobuf.rb b/lib/tapioca/dsl/compilers/protobuf.rb
index ba458a777..1273841d1 100644
--- a/lib/tapioca/dsl/compilers/protobuf.rb
+++ b/lib/tapioca/dsl/compilers/protobuf.rb
@@ -177,6 +177,18 @@ def gather_constants
 
         private
 
+        sig { params(desc: Google::Protobuf::FieldDescriptor).returns(T::Boolean) }
+        def has_presence?(desc)
+          if desc.respond_to?(:has_presence?)
+            # This method is only defined in google-protobuf 3.26.0 and later
+            desc.has_presence?
+          else
+            # In older versions of the gem, the only way we can get this information is
+            # by checking if an instance of the class responds to the expected method
+            T.unsafe(constant.allocate).respond_to?("has_#{desc.name}?")
+          end
+        end
+
         sig { params(klass: RBI::Scope, names: String).void }
         def create_type_members(klass, *names)
           klass.create_extend("T::Generic")
@@ -302,7 +314,7 @@ def create_descriptor_method(klass, desc)
             return_type: "void",
           )
 
-          if desc.has_presence?
+          if has_presence?(desc)
             klass.create_method(
               "has_#{field.name}?",
               return_type: "Object",
diff --git a/spec/tapioca/cli/dsl_spec.rb b/spec/tapioca/cli/dsl_spec.rb
index fb665b93f..ee5934bed 100644
--- a/spec/tapioca/cli/dsl_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tapioca/cli/dsl_spec.rb
@@ -2715,6 +2715,44 @@ class Application < Rails::Application
           assert_success_status(res)
         end
       end
+
+      # These tests are in this file rather than in google_protobuf_spec.rb because they require
+      # a different version of the google-protobuf gem than the one that is used in the rest of the tests.
+      describe "google-protobuf" do
+        describe "version <= 3.25" do
+          before(:all) do
+            @project.require_real_gem("google-protobuf", "~>3.25")
+            @project.bundle_install!
+          end
+
+          it "generates has_{field.name}? methods in RBI files for classes with Protobuf" do
+            @project.exec("mkdir lib")
+            @project.write!("proto/cart.proto", <<~PROTO)
+              syntax = "proto3";
+
+              message Cart {
+                enum VALUE_TYPE {
+                  NULL = 0;
+                  FIXED_AMOUNT = 1;
+                  PERCENTAGE = 2;
+                }
+
+                optional VALUE_TYPE value_type = 1;
+              }
+            PROTO
+
+            result = @project.exec("protoc --proto_path=proto --ruby_out=lib proto/cart.proto")
+            raise "Error executing protoc: #{result.err}" unless result.status
+
+            result = @project.tapioca("dsl Cart")
+            assert_empty_stderr(result)
+            assert_success_status(result)
+
+            cart_rbi = @project.read("sorbet/rbi/dsl/cart.rbi")
+            assert_includes(cart_rbi, "def has_value_type?; end")
+          end
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 end