Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

separate out reactants and products for new SBML version #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2021

Conversation

anandijain
Copy link
Contributor

wont pass until new SBML is released.

all tests pass locally

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #28 (cdee4d8) into main (60f56f6) will increase coverage by 0.35%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.89%   86.25%   +0.35%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         156      160       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          134      138       +4     
  Misses         22       22              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/reactionsystem.jl 86.25% <100.00%> (+0.35%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60f56f6...cdee4d8. Read the comment docs.

@anandijain
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paulflang just want ur double check that this shouldn't mess with any of the test-suite verifications right

Copy link
Member

@paulflang paulflang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me.

@anandijain anandijain merged commit 7d5f482 into main Aug 9, 2021
@anandijain anandijain deleted the aj/reac_prod2 branch August 9, 2021 18:26
@paulflang
Copy link
Member

I do not see a reason why cases in the test suite that passed before should break now. But I cannot guarantee that. I am wondering if it would make sense to add checks for regression in SBMLBioModelsRepository.jl.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants