You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The tutorial in the documentation for Intergral.jl recommends the use of the “nout” and “batch” keywords which are deprecated. When using these, a warning is given and it is recommended to use IntegralFunction and BatchIntegralFunction instead. There is, however, no documentation on how to use Integral function and BatchIntegralFunction.
I would recommend that the use of “nout” and “batch” be removed from the tutorial in the documentation of Integral.jl and that a example for how to use IntegralFunction and BatchIntegralFunction is added instead.
Hi, thanks for the issue. We have docstrings for these functions, which can be viewed from the REPL with
julia> using Integrals
julia>?IntegralFunction
but these live in SciMLBase.jl instead of this repo and I'm not sure if the SciML policy is to document the symbols here or there. @ChrisRackauckas is there preference? It would still be good for me to update the README since I completely ignored it during the updates in favor of writing better tests.
The tutorial in the documentation for Intergral.jl recommends the use of the “nout” and “batch” keywords which are deprecated. When using these, a warning is given and it is recommended to use IntegralFunction and BatchIntegralFunction instead. There is, however, no documentation on how to use Integral function and BatchIntegralFunction.
I would recommend that the use of “nout” and “batch” be removed from the tutorial in the documentation of Integral.jl and that a example for how to use IntegralFunction and BatchIntegralFunction is added instead.
This is the first time I report an Issue likt this so I hope I did it correctly, if I did not please let me know. Below a link to discourse on the subject on the Julia forum. https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-any-documentation-on-integralfunctions/108970
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: