Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: standardise workflows using SciML's reusable workflows #49

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

thazhemadam
Copy link
Member

Update the workflows in this repository to use SciML's reusable workflows.
This is part of a larger effort to standardise the SciML's CI workflows for more generic and common requirements, to keep the workflows uniform and easier to maintain.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.98%. Comparing base (16a3b74) to head (93b00e7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #49      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.68%   91.98%   -0.70%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         287      287              
==========================================
- Hits          266      264       -2     
- Misses         21       23       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from 4e8ad0d to c99ffb7 Compare April 30, 2024 15:23
@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from c99ffb7 to 93b00e7 Compare April 30, 2024 15:45
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 4a555db into master May 1, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the at/use-reusable-workflows branch May 1, 2024 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants