-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MG45 - ADT: Pathology data ETL #149
MG45 - ADT: Pathology data ETL #149
Conversation
…D_general_transform change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great pending the couple of changes requested by Brad and Jess!
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀 LGTM! 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent!
Adding pathology dataset to the set of transforms.
See Jira ticket for more information
The
pathology
andbiomarkers
datasets have the same fundamental input and output structure and require the same transform. Instead of duplicating code, the existing transform for thebiomarkers
dataset was generalized to allow it to be used by thepathology
dataset. All related tests were also generalized but were not functionally changed.Changes
pathology
dataset was added tomodelad_test_config.yaml
.pathology
dataset was added toprocess.py
.biomarkers_transform
function was renamed tomodelAD_general_transform
.modelAD_general_transform
to allow multiple datasets to use it.