Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wave maker characterization #101

Open
ryancoe opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

wave maker characterization #101

ryancoe opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
analysis process results/data, draw conclusions

Comments

@ryancoe
Copy link
Member

ryancoe commented Aug 31, 2021

After completing #3 and #100...

  1. Run a test matrix of regular waves with a range of frequencies and amplitudes (e.g., f = [1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4]Hz, A = [5, 10, 20, 30, 40]mm)
  2. Compare amplitude measured by wave probes against the desire amplitude
  3. Present results here (we'll decide a course of action at that point)

We will present this work in Section 7 of the HardwareX paper.

@ryancoe ryancoe changed the title wave maker tuning wave maker characterization Nov 2, 2022
@ryancoe ryancoe added this to the Paper submission milestone Nov 2, 2022
@ryancoe
Copy link
Member Author

ryancoe commented Nov 2, 2022

Note that we had originally conceptualized this issues a wave maker tuning activity. We will limit this issue to a first step of characterization and leave tuning to a separate issue.

@ryancoe ryancoe added the analysis process results/data, draw conclusions label Nov 2, 2022
@nickross4444
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not 100% sure this is worth tackling. Not only did we observe significant capacitive coupling when touching the probes, but the data looks really noisy inconsistent to me:
image
(position determined by encoder)
plotted with:
wavemakercharacterize.txt

@ryancoe
Copy link
Member Author

ryancoe commented Feb 20, 2023

You may be right @nickross4444. Could you upload a zip of the data for me to look at?

@nickross4444
Copy link
Collaborator

nickross4444 commented Mar 16, 2023

Data used for the previous plots:

P steps.csv
D steps.csv

Other testing data:
Open.loop.data.zip

Most recent and extensive dataset, collected during demo day:

DemoDayData.zip

@ryancoe ryancoe assigned ryancoe and unassigned nickross4444 Mar 16, 2023
@ryancoe
Copy link
Member Author

ryancoe commented Mar 16, 2023

@nickross4444 - These files are empty...?

@nickross4444
Copy link
Collaborator

nickross4444 commented Mar 16, 2023

Sorry about that @ryancoe, they should be correct now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analysis process results/data, draw conclusions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants