Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snowfakery 2.5.0 #599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

Snowfakery 2.5.0 #599

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

prescod
Copy link
Contributor

@prescod prescod commented Feb 2, 2022

No description provided.

@prescod prescod requested a review from a team as a code owner February 2, 2022 22:17
@TheBitShepherd TheBitShepherd merged commit 283012c into main Feb 2, 2022
@TheBitShepherd TheBitShepherd deleted the feature/snowfakery-2.5.0 branch February 2, 2022 22:27
@@ -4,6 +4,16 @@ In the beginning, programmers created the databases. Now the databases were form

And so [Salesforce.org](http://salesforce.org/) said “Let there be data,” and there was Snowfakery. And it was good.

## Snowfakery 2.5
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason you're leaving off the .0 here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to be the pattern I've been using all along.

@pconrad-sfdo pconrad-sfdo added the docs reviewed The docs were reviewed by a writer. label Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs reviewed The docs were reviewed by a writer.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants