Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPS Enhancments #15

Open
7 tasks
RobertK66 opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
7 tasks

GPS Enhancments #15

RobertK66 opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement request to improve code quality/ features future use a feature with currently low priority question Further information is needed from PM/SE

Comments

@RobertK66
Copy link
Owner

  • add support for PPS pin
  • add power on/off support (enable pin)
  • add basic PMTK command support (Tx UART conection)
    • get module type&version
    • choose NMEA packets to use and the period of transmission
    • make automatic Standby/On cycles available to use
  • optional use of fix pin ?
@RobertK66 RobertK66 added the enhancement request to improve code quality/ features label Mar 15, 2022
@RobertK66 RobertK66 mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2022
@RobertK66
Copy link
Owner Author

@kodsurf : Does the 'flight'-GPS have a PPS pin?
This is a GPIO pin giving the exact timing of the communicated UTC timestamp. To have accuracy down to more then some 10/100 ms (which the NMEA msg take over the UART and UART buffers the received Chars and ...) you have to take the time from the msg and then 'wait' for the GPIO to make its transition (best by IRQ)....

@RobertK66
Copy link
Owner Author

RobertK66 commented Feb 7, 2023

@WolfgangTreb , @AndyFHWN: any new info about 'Flight GPS' available (Type, techn. Spec, ....)?

@RobertK66 RobertK66 added the question Further information is needed from PM/SE label Feb 7, 2023
@AndyFHWN
Copy link
Collaborator

AndyFHWN commented Feb 7, 2023

The decision on GPS is coupled with ADCS, because we do not need an extra module if GPS is integrated in future ADCS. Sorry, most likely this will be delayed.

@RobertK66
Copy link
Owner Author

RobertK66 commented Feb 7, 2023

No Prob, I only try to make the issue list some sort of 'complete', because for the first time in this project my head has a approximate idea what a 'final OBC-Core' Firmware could look like 😄

@RobertK66
Copy link
Owner Author

And I use the 'question' tag now to indicate the ones we (OBC developer) have to wait for info....

@RobertK66 RobertK66 added the future use a feature with currently low priority label Feb 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement request to improve code quality/ features future use a feature with currently low priority question Further information is needed from PM/SE
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants