Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find out optimal implementation similar to STP's push and pop #13

Open
Robbepop opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Find out optimal implementation similar to STP's push and pop #13

Robbepop opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
A-parser Task operating on the stevia_parser crate in isolation. C-question A question.

Comments

@Robbepop
Copy link
Owner

Find out what scopes push & pop in STP are and how to incorporate them into this SMT solver.

Note: STP has a stack of vectors that acts as assertion scope level. Users may wish to add or remove such scopes to add or remove entire groups of assertions that have been added to the removed scope level. The STP scope design is inefficient and should not be taken over to Stevia. Stevia should model this concept with a single vector for the assertions and another vector for entry points to new scope levels.

@Robbepop Robbepop added C-question A question. A-parser Task operating on the stevia_parser crate in isolation. labels Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-parser Task operating on the stevia_parser crate in isolation. C-question A question.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant