Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Translation equivariance and translation action on type-n steerable vectors #8

Open
zeroAska opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@zeroAska
Copy link

zeroAska commented Aug 1, 2023

In the appendix of the paper, "translations are trivial to deal with". However, while we can use Wiger D matrices as O(3) representations acting on the steerable vectors, I'm confused that how to have R^3 translations acting on the steerable feature vectors, if there are multiple types?

I'm aware that in the message passing frameworks, the convolution are built upon relative positions between two nodes x_j - x_i, but shouldn't this be translational invariant, instead of translation equivariant?

@RobDHess
Copy link
Owner

RobDHess commented Sep 1, 2023

Hi,

It is true that relative positions are translation invariant. However, since the feature vector travels with the node as the graph is translated, the feature vector itself is equivariant.

Kind regards,

Rob

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants