You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the appendix of the paper, "translations are trivial to deal with". However, while we can use Wiger D matrices as O(3) representations acting on the steerable vectors, I'm confused that how to have R^3 translations acting on the steerable feature vectors, if there are multiple types?
I'm aware that in the message passing frameworks, the convolution are built upon relative positions between two nodes x_j - x_i, but shouldn't this be translational invariant, instead of translation equivariant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is true that relative positions are translation invariant. However, since the feature vector travels with the node as the graph is translated, the feature vector itself is equivariant.
In the appendix of the paper, "translations are trivial to deal with". However, while we can use Wiger D matrices as O(3) representations acting on the steerable vectors, I'm confused that how to have R^3 translations acting on the steerable feature vectors, if there are multiple types?
I'm aware that in the message passing frameworks, the convolution are built upon relative positions between two nodes x_j - x_i, but shouldn't this be translational invariant, instead of translation equivariant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: