You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When computing yearly means for STELLDBTN and surrounding stations, I noticed the yearly mean of STELLDBTN for 2013 is unexpectely low. This was originally reported in M220207273 on 9-2-2022.
Is this to be expected or is something wrong with the measurement timeseries?
In a study for RMM kalibration/validation, a shift in the bias was observed (figure from feb 2022):
However, there is no sudden jump of 0.5 meter visible in the measurement timeseries from ddl. It is possible that this is a model artifact, however unlikely. It could be related to the low yearly mean.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When computing yearly means for STELLDBTN and surrounding stations, I noticed the yearly mean of STELLDBTN for 2013 is unexpectely low. This was originally reported in M220207273 on 9-2-2022.
Gives (y-axis units are centimeters):
Is this to be expected or is something wrong with the measurement timeseries?
In a study for RMM kalibration/validation, a shift in the bias was observed (figure from feb 2022):
However, there is no sudden jump of 0.5 meter visible in the measurement timeseries from ddl. It is possible that this is a model artifact, however unlikely. It could be related to the low yearly mean.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: