You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ATM _run+ would increment throughout all sequences, ie. for _acq-1_run+, _acq-2_run+, _acq-1_run+, _acq-2_run+ we would get _acq-1_run-1, _acq-2_run-2, _acq-1_run-3, _acq-2_run-4, whenever what we really want is _acq-1_run-1, _acq-2_run-1, _acq-1_run-2, _acq-2_run-2. So we should either fix "unconditionally" to do it within the name otherwise, or do it via some additional _run+?.
In general we advise against using such auto-increments since then becomes impossible to account for canceled runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ATM
_run+
would increment throughout all sequences, ie. for_acq-1_run+
,_acq-2_run+
,_acq-1_run+
,_acq-2_run+
we would get_acq-1_run-1
,_acq-2_run-2
,_acq-1_run-3
,_acq-2_run-4
, whenever what we really want is_acq-1_run-1
,_acq-2_run-1
,_acq-1_run-2
,_acq-2_run-2
. So we should either fix "unconditionally" to do it within the name otherwise, or do it via some additional_run+?
.In general we advise against using such auto-increments since then becomes impossible to account for canceled runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: